Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Hong Kong Legislator Raises Concern Over Crypto Licensing System as Major Exchanges Withdraw Applicati

Hong Kong Legislative Council member Wu Shuo has voiced criticism against Hong Kong’s cryptocurrency licensing system, citing its impact on market confidence.

In an article published recently, Wu highlighted concerns surrounding the licensing requirements imposed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), which have led several major exchanges to withdraw their license applications.

The licensing system, set to take effect on June 1, 2023, mandates that virtual asset trading platforms operating in Hong Kong obtain a license from regulatory authorities by the end of the transition period, which concludes on June 1, 2024.

Failure to obtain the license would result in the termination of their business operations.

Major Exchanges Withdraw Applications from Hong Kong

Wu drew attention to the series of withdrawals that have taken place in recent months.

On March 28, 2024, HKVAEX, suspected to be affiliated with Binance, withdrew its license application.

Subsequently, on May 14, IBTCEX, QuanXLab, and Huobi HK followed suit, followed by Gate.HK on May 22, OKX HK on May 24, and Bybit (Spark Fintech Limited) on May 31.

These withdrawals have left only 17 virtual asset trading platforms remaining on the application list, with a total of 11 companies having withdrawn or returned their license applications.

Wu attributed the withdrawals to the requirement imposed by the Hong Kong SFC, which requires applicants for virtual asset trading platform licenses to commit to not having mainland Chinese users in any region. ‘

The requirement poses a challenge for traditional offshore exchanges, making it difficult for them to comply.

OKX attempted to form an industry alliance to oppose the requirement but was ultimately unsuccessful.

Industry insiders have mentioned that the entities that have withdrawn their applications could potentially update their legal frameworks or entities and reapply in the future.

However, they may not be able to reapply using a brand similar to that of an offshore exchange.

Currently, 11 platforms, including HKbitEX, PantherTrade, Accumulus, DFX Labs, Bixincom, xWhale, YAX, Bullish, Cryptocom, WhaleFin, and Matrixport HK, remain as licensed applicants.

Only OSL and HashKey have obtained formal licenses thus far.

SFC to Conduct On-Site Inspections of Crypto Platforms

The Hong Kong SFC has announced that it will be conducting on-site inspections of local virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs) that have not yet completed their regulatory applications after the licensing deadline of June 1.

The SFC’s move comes as a reminder to crypto companies of their obligation to obtain licensing before the deadline.

After June 1, all local crypto trading platforms in Hong Kong must be licensed or “deemed-to-be-licensed” by the SFC.

Meanwhile, Hong Kong has launched its first batch of ETFs focused on cryptocurrencies, marking potential competition for the popular Bitcoin products in the United States.

Bloomberg Intelligence’s Rebecca Sin estimates that Bitcoin and Ether funds in Hong Kong could amass around $1 billion over the next two years.

Likewise, the CEO of CF Benchmarks, a subsidiary of cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, predicts that Hong Kong crypto ETFs will overcome their lackluster start and accumulate over $1 billion in assets by the end of 2024.

The post Hong Kong Legislator Raises Concern Over Crypto Licensing System as Major Exchanges Withdraw Applicati appeared first on Cryptonews.

You May Also Like

Editor's Pick

After the final lecture of my Fall 2022 International Economic Policy course (an undergraduate offering meant to introduce non-economics majors to the economics of...

Editor's Pick

Real gross domestic product rose at a revised 3.2 percent annualized rate in the third quarter versus a 0.6 percent rate of decline in...

Editor's Pick

For years the North Korean playbook was obvious to the world. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea wanted to be the center of attention....

Editor's Pick

On April 23, 1985, the Coca-Cola Company made one of the biggest mistakes in American business history: it changed the formula for Coca-Cola. Outraged...

Disclaimer:, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2024