Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


$500,000 Bitcoin Fee Blunder: Paxos Revealed as Responsible Party

The US-based crypto service provider Paxos has been revealed as the party responsible for .

The , made on September 10 at 5.10 PM UTC, was for a payment of only $200 worth of BTC, but amazingly came with a transaction fee of around $500,000, setting a new record in Bitcoin transaction fees.

The payment was sent from what many at the time believed was a well-experienced Bitcoin user, given a history of sending and receiving more than 120,000 transactions.

Now, the sender has been identified as Paxos, the US-regulated company that is behind several stablecoins and provides various crypto-related services.

Paxos confirms blunder

In a given to crypto news outlet The Block, a Paxos spokesperson confirmed that they were behind the fee blunder.

“Paxos overpaid the BTC network fee on Sept. 10, 2023,” the spokesperson said, while adding:

“This was due to a bug on a single transfer and it has been fixed. Paxos is in contact with the miner to recoup the funds.”

Mining pool co-founder regrets

As Paxos said in the statement, it appears they have indeed been in touch with Chun Wang, co-founder of F2Pool, the mining pool that mined the block containing the transaction.

But despite first to keep the fee on hold for three days in case anyone would claim it, Wang on Wednesday said he was “annoyed and regretted agreeing to refund that 20 BTC.”

According to Wang, there was a disagreement with Paxos over the timezone used when counting the days from when he gave his promise.

“So what should I do,” the mining pool operator asked his followers on X.

Responding to Wang’s post, members of the Bitcoin community on X offered different suggestions on how to resolve the matter.

While some suggested the mining pool should simply refund the 20 BTC it received, others said he should distribute it to miners in the pool so Paxos can learn a “hard lesson” from its mistake.

As of press time on Thursday, it appears the situation is still unresolved, with no new updates from Wang about the massive transaction fee.

This post appeared first on

You May Also Like

Editor's Pick

Real gross domestic product rose at a revised 3.2 percent annualized rate in the third quarter versus a 0.6 percent rate of decline in...

Editor's Pick

In Risky Business: Why Insurance Markets Fail and What to Do About It (Yale University Press, 2023), economists Liran Einav (Stanford), Amy Finkelstein (MIT),...

Editor's Pick

After the final lecture of my Fall 2022 International Economic Policy course (an undergraduate offering meant to introduce non-economics majors to the economics of...

Editor's Pick

For years the North Korean playbook was obvious to the world. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea wanted to be the center of attention....

Disclaimer:, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2023