Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Crypto Blunder: User Accidentally Pays $500,000 in Fees for a $200 Bitcoin Transfer

A user paid around $500,000 in transaction fees to send just $200 of BTC last weekend, setting a new record in Bitcoin transaction fees.

The , made on September 10 at 5.10 PM UTC, was sent from a well-experienced Bitcoin user, which many believe must be either an exchange or some sort of Bitcoin payment provider given a history of sending and receiving more than 120,000 transactions.

According to, the user paid close to 20 BTC (around $500,000) in transaction fees, overpaying by a whopping 481,299x.

Average transaction fees for Bitcoin typically varies between $1 and $2.

Community speculates on reason

The transaction quickly became a topic of discussion in the Bitcoin community on social media platform X, where many people speculated on the reason why the user would overpay by such a massive amount.

While some suggested it could be part of a money laundering scheme agreed to with certain mining pool operators, others noted that such a theory make little sense because it would be practically impossible for any party to benefit from the fee payment.

So far, the most likely explanation appears to have come from Casa chief technology officer and popular Bitcoiner Jameson Lopp, who wrote that the transaction likely comes from an automated payment system “with buggy software.”

“They’ve received 60,000+ txns and sent 60,000+ txns from the same address (bad practice) and likely calculated their change output incorrectly,” Lopp wrote.

He added in a follow-up post that there is a good chance the sender hasn’t even noticed the blunder yet, saying “they still have a ton of funds in the wallet and it’s still sending transactions.”

The specific transaction fee was received by the major Bitcoin mining pool F2Pool, which mined the block that included the transaction.

to F2Pool co-founder Chun Wang, the 20 BTC will be placed on hold for three days.

If they remained unclaimed after that, the fee will be distributed among miners in the pool.

This post appeared first on

You May Also Like

Editor's Pick

Real gross domestic product rose at a revised 3.2 percent annualized rate in the third quarter versus a 0.6 percent rate of decline in...

Editor's Pick

In Risky Business: Why Insurance Markets Fail and What to Do About It (Yale University Press, 2023), economists Liran Einav (Stanford), Amy Finkelstein (MIT),...

Editor's Pick

After the final lecture of my Fall 2022 International Economic Policy course (an undergraduate offering meant to introduce non-economics majors to the economics of...

Editor's Pick

For years the North Korean playbook was obvious to the world. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea wanted to be the center of attention....

Disclaimer:, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2023