Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


3rd Year of Presidential Term is Supposed to Be Bullish

Now that the November 2022 mid-term elections are behind us, the stock market is now in year 3 of the 4-year presidential cycle pattern. Some analysts look at that on a calendar day basis, but I prefer to count the years as beginning on November 1 for this purpose, since the stock market typically responds to whoever gets elected president as soon as it knows the outcome. Usually that is right away, although back in the year 2000, it took all the way until mid-December to settle things.

During a typical 4-year presidential term, the stock market tends to be flattish during the first 2 years. Then the third year is nearly always an up year. The election year can be a lot more iffy, and there are examples of election years turning out really badly, as was the case in 2000 and 2008. But third years are really consistently up, almost all of the time. The notable exceptions were 1931, when the world was in the middle of the Great Depression, and 1939, when the Wehrmacht was marching through Poland. Outside of conditions like those, the third year can usually be counted on to be an up year.

This time may be different, though. The third year up phase did get off to a great start coming out of the October 2022 lows right on schedule. But the rally has faltered in December in a way that the Presidential Cycle Pattern (PCP) in this week’s chart does not portray.

The PCP is formulated by chopping up all of the data into 4-year chunks of time, then averaging them together. A few more adjustments are needed to get consistent data. One such adjustment is to equalize all of the years. Up until 1952, the stock market traded on Saturdays; then, in the mid-1960s there was a period when trading was shut down on Wednesday so that the “paperwork” could get caught up (there were no computers then). So to get each 4-year period to be of a consistent length, some trimming of Saturdays or duplication of prior days for uneven holidays is needed.

I also recalculate each 4-year period’s prices to reflect a starting value of 1.00 as of Nov. 1 of the election year. That way, higher price levels of recent years won’t throw off the calculation of the “average”.

The big decline we have seen in December 2022 is definitely out of character for a third year. This does not necessarily mean that the stock market cannot get back into gear with what the PCP shows, but it does say that we are not off to a typical start. And this makes sense, when we consider that the Federal Reserve is not only raising interest rates at the fastest rate ever, it is also selling off its Treasury and mortgage holdings at the fastest rate ever.

We know that the first round of quantitative tightening (QT1) in the summer of 2008 had a horrible effect for the stock market. QT2 in 2018-19 was not as bad, because it was balanced out by an income tax rate cut enacted in 2017. But QT2 did keep the stock market just moving sideways, until the Fed started buying Treasuries and MBS again in late 2019.

In physics terms, there is always a “balance of forces equation”. The motion of the object or particle in question depends on the sum of all of those forces. For 2023, we have the bullish force of the third year of a presidential term being met by the bearish forces of Fed rate hikes AND Fed QT. If ever there were a condition under which the bullish tendency of the third year might not work, this is that time.

Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    You May Also Like


    Mimiq, Inc is announcing today the launch of their new product, Mimiq Track, at CES as part of their latest product line to operate...


    Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (ETR: BMW) shares have advanced more than 15% since the beginning of October 2022, and the current share price stands...

    Editor's Pick

    Real gross domestic product rose at a revised 3.2 percent annualized rate in the third quarter versus a 0.6 percent rate of decline in...

    Editor's Pick

    In Risky Business: Why Insurance Markets Fail and What to Do About It (Yale University Press, 2023), economists Liran Einav (Stanford), Amy Finkelstein (MIT),...

    Disclaimer:, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2023